Template:Other uses Template:Pp-semi-indef Template:Taxobox

The Venus Flytrap (also Venus's Flytrap or Venus' Flytrap), Dionaea muscipula, is a carnivorous plant that catches and digests animal prey—mostly insects and arachnids. Its trapping structure is formed by the terminal portion of each of the plant's leaves and is triggered by tiny hairs on their inner surfaces. When an insect or spider crawling along the leaves contacts a hair, the trap closes if a different hair is contacted within twenty seconds of the first strike. The requirement of redundant triggering in this mechanism serves as a safeguard against a waste of energy in trapping objects with no nutritional value.

Dionaea is a monotypic genus closely related to the waterwheel plant and sundews, all of which belong to the family Droseraceae.


The Venus Flytrap is a small plant whose structure can be described as a rosette of four to seven leaves, which arise from a short subterranean stem that is actually a bulb-like object. Each stem reaches a maximum size of about three to ten centimeters, depending on the time of year;[1] longer leaves with robust traps are usually formed after flowering. Flytraps that have more than 7 leaves are colonies formed by rosettes that have divided beneath the ground.

Drawing of Venus Flytrap

Illustration of the Venus Flytrap from Curtis's Botanical Magazine by William Curtis (1746–1799)

The leaf blade is divided into two regions: a flat, heart-shaped photosynthesis-capable petiole, and a pair of terminal lobes hinged at the midrib, forming the trap which is the true leaf. The upper surface of these lobes contains red anthocyanin pigments and its edges secrete mucilage. The lobes exhibit rapid plant movements, snapping shut when stimulated by prey. The trapping mechanism is tripped when prey contacts one of the three hair-like trichomes that are found on the upper surface of each of the lobes. The trapping mechanism is so specialized that it can distinguish between living prey and non-prey stimuli such as falling raindrops;[2] two trigger hairs must be touched in succession within 20 seconds of each other or one hair touched twice in rapid succession,[2] whereupon the lobes of the trap will snap shut in about one-tenth of a second.[3] The edges of the lobes are fringed by stiff hair-like protrusions or cilia, which mesh together and prevent large prey from escaping. (These protrusions, and the trigger hairs, also known as sensitive hairs, are probably homologous with the tentacles found in this plant’s close relatives, the sundews.) Scientists are currently unsure about the evolutionary history of the Venus flytrap; however scientists have made hypotheses that the flytrap evolved from Drosera (sundews).[4]

The holes in the meshwork allow small prey to escape, presumably because the benefit that would be obtained from them would be less than the cost of digesting them. If the prey is too small and escapes, the trap will reopen within 12 hours. If the prey moves around in the trap, it tightens and digestion begins more quickly.

Speed of closing can vary depending on the amount of humidity, light, size of prey, and general growing conditions. The speed with which traps close can be used as an indicator of a plant's general health. Venus Flytraps are not as humidity-dependent as are some other carnivorous plants, such as Nepenthes, Cephalotus, most Heliamphora, and some Drosera.

The Venus Flytrap exhibits variations in petiole shape and length and whether the leaf lies flat on the ground or extends up at an angle of about 40–60 degrees. The four major forms are: 'typica', the most common, with broad decumbent petioles; 'erecta', with leaves at a 45-degree angle; 'linearis', with narrow petioles and leaves at 45 degrees; and 'filiformis', with extremely narrow or linear petioles. Except for 'filiformis', all of these can be stages in leaf production of any plant depending on season (decumbent in summer versus short versus semi-erect in spring), length of photoperiod (long petioles in spring versus short in summer), and intensity of light (wide petioles in low light intensity versus narrow in brighter light).Template:Citation needed

When grown from seed, plants take around four to five years to reach maturity and will live for 20 to 30 years if cultivated in the right conditions.[5]


The plant's common name refers to Venus, the Roman goddess of love. The genus name, Dionaea ("daughter of Dione"), refers to the Greek goddess Aphrodite, while the species name, muscipula is Latin for "mousetrap".[6]

Historically, the plant was also known by the slang term "tipitiwitchet" or "tippity twitchet", possibly an oblique reference to the plant's resemblance to human female genitalia.[6][7]



Closeup of one of the hinged trigger hairs.

Prey selectivityRectify

Most carnivorous plants selectively feed on specific prey. This selection is due to the available prey and the type of trap used by the organism. With the Venus Flytrap, prey is limited to beetles, spiders and arthropods. In fact, the Dionaea diet is 33% ants, 30% spiders, 10% beetles, and 10% grasshoppers, with fewer than 5% flying insects.[8] Given that Dionaea evolved from an ancestral form of Drosera (carnivorous plants that use a sticky trap instead of a snap trap) the reason for this evolutionary branching becomes clear. Whilst Drosera consume smaller, aerial insects, Dionaea consume larger terrestrial bugs. From these larger bugs, Dionaea are able to extract more nutrients. This gives Dionaea an evolutionary advantage over their ancestral sticky trap form.[9]

Mechanism of trappingRectify

Dionaea muscipula closing trap animation

A closing trap.

Dionaea muscipula closed cilia

Closed cilia around the prey

The Venus Flytrap is one of a very small group of plants capable of rapid movement, such as Mimosa, the Telegraph plant, sundews and bladderworts.

The mechanism by which the trap snaps shut involves a complex interaction between elasticity, turgor and growth. In the open, untripped state, the lobes are convex (bent outwards), but in the closed state, the lobes are concave (forming a cavity). It is the rapid flipping of this bistable state that closes the trap,[3] but the mechanism by which this occurs is still poorly understood. When the trigger hairs are stimulated, an action potential (mostly involving calcium ions—see calcium in biology) is generated, which propagates across the lobes and stimulates cells in the lobes and in the midrib between them.[10] Exactly what this stimulation does is still debated. The acid growth theory states that individual cells in the outer layers of the lobes and midrib rapidly move 1H+ (hydrogen ions) into their cell walls, lowering the pH and loosening the extracellular components, which allows them to swell rapidly by osmosis, thus elongating and changing the shape of the trap lobe. Alternatively, cells in the inner layers of the lobes and midrib may rapidly secrete other ions, allowing water to follow by osmosis, and the cells to collapse. Both of these mechanisms may play a role and have some experimental evidence to support them.[11][12]


If the prey is unable to escape, it will continue to stimulate the inner surface of the lobes, and this causes a further growth response that forces the edges of the lobes together, eventually sealing the trap hermetically and forming a 'stomach' in which digestion occurs. Digestion is catalysed by enzymes secreted by glands in the lobes.

Oxidative protein modification is likely to be a predigestive mechanism of the Dionaea muscipula. Aqueous leaf extracts have been found to contain quinones such as the naphthoquinone plumbagin that couples to different NADH-dependent diaphorases to produce superoxide and hydrogen peroxide upon autoxidation.[13] Such oxidative modification could rupture animal cell membranes. Plumbagin is known to induce apoptosis, associated with the regulation of Bcl-2 family of proteins.[14] When the Dionaea extracts were preincubated with diaphorases and NADH in the presence of serum albumin (SA), subsequent tryptic digestion of SA was facilitated.[13] Since the secretory glands of Droseraceae contain proteases and possibly other degradative enzymes, it may be that the presence of oxygen-activating redox cofactors function as extracellular predigestive oxidants to render membrane-bound proteins of the prey (insects) more susceptible to proteolytic attacks.[13]

Digestion takes about ten days, after which the prey is reduced to a husk of chitin. The trap then reopens, and is ready for reuse.[15]


Template:Expand section The Venus Flytrap's evolution was the product of a "Hobson's choice" in which plants that did not evolve nutrient-capturing abilities in nitrogen and phosphorus-poor environments would not have survived. Their carnivorous traps were evolutionarily selected to allow these organisms to survive their harsh environments.[16]


The Venus Flytrap is found in nitrogen and phosphorus-poor environments, such as bogs and wet savannahs. Small in stature and slow growing, the Venus flytrap tolerates fire well, and depends on periodic burning to suppress its competition.[17] Fire suppression threatens its future in the wild.[18] It survives in wet sandy and peaty soils. Although it has been successfully transplanted and grown in many locales around the world, it is found natively only in North and South Carolina in the United States, specifically within a 60-mile radius of Wilmington, North Carolina.[19] One such place is North Carolina's Green Swamp. There also appears to be a naturalized population of Venus Flytraps in northern Florida as well as populations in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. The nutritional poverty of the soil is the reason that the plant relies on such elaborate traps: insect prey provide the nitrogen for protein formation that the soil cannot. The Venus Flytrap is not a tropical plant and can tolerate mild winters. In fact, Venus Flytraps that do not go through a period of winter dormancy will weaken and die after a period of time.[20]



Venus flytraps are popular as cultivated plants, but have a reputation for being difficult to grow.[1] Successfully growing these specialized plants requires recreating a close approximation to the plant's natural habitat.

Healthy Venus flytraps will produce scapes of white flowers in spring, however, many growers remove the flowering stem early (2–3 inches), as flowering consumes some of the plant's energy, and reduces the rate of trap production. If healthy plants are allowed to flower, successful pollination will result in the production of dozens of small, shiny black seeds.

Plants can be propagated by seed, although seedlings take several years to mature. More commonly, they are propagated by division in spring or summer.


Venus flytraps are by far the most commonly recognized and cultivated carnivorous plant. They are sold as houseplants and are often found at florists, hardware stores and supermarkets. During the past ten years or so large quantities of cultivars (cultivated varieties) have come into the market through tissue culture of select genetic mutations. It is through tissue culture that great quantities of plants are raised for commercial markets.

The registered cultivars include (name of registrant in braces):

The Dionaea Dentate Traps Group includes registered cultivars bearing shortened, triangular teeth, such as 'Dentate Traps', 'Red Piranha', and 'Sawtooth'.[45]

An unofficial list includes many more names, with more added annually. None of these "variation names" are officially recognized unless the name is properly documented, registered and accepted by the International Registration Authority for carnivorous plant cultivars, the International Carnivorous Plant Society.

Published but unregistered cultivar names include (name of nominant in braces):

  • Dionaea muscipula 'Big Mouth' {Tony Camilleri}[23]
  • Dionaea muscipula 'Clumping Cultivar' {Peter D'Amato}[23]
  • Dionaea muscipula 'Dentate' {Peter D'Amato} [established as Dionaea muscipula 'Dentate Traps'][23]
  • Dionaea muscipula 'Dente' {Peter D'Amato} [established as Dionaea muscipula 'Dentate Traps'][23]
  • Dionaea muscipula 'Kinchyaku' {Katsuhiko Kondo}[23]
  • Dionaea muscipula 'Red Rosetted' {Peter D'Amato}[23]


Currently, there are estimated to be more than 3–6 million plants in cultivation compared to only 35,800 plants remaining in nature.[46] Several prominent plant conservationists suggest the plant be labeled as Vulnerable.[46] Precise data on the distribution of population sizes in 1992 from the Office of Plant Protection suggests a more dire state for the species. Every size class in red is slated for eventual extinction with the green ones persisting longer. Smaller populations may go extinct for stochastic reasons and, since small population are more numerous in nature now and contribute more to the total number of plants remaining in the species, most of this unique and remarkable carnivorous plant species may be going extinct soon. Note that the figure of 35,800 plants in 1992 is over 15 years old and may not accurately reflect the current situation.Template:Citation needed


  1. 1.0 1.1 Template:Cite web
  2. 2.0 2.1 Template:Cite book
  3. 3.0 3.1 Template:Cite journal
  4. Template:Cite journal
  5. Template:Cite book
  6. 6.0 6.1 Template:Cite web
  7. Template:Cite web
  8. Template:Cite journal
  9. Template:Cite journal
  10. Template:Cite journal
  11. Williams, S. E. 2002. Comparative physiology of the Droseraceae sensu stricto—How do tentacles bend and traps close? Proceedings of the 4th International Carnivorous Plant Society Conference. Tokyo, Japan. pp. 77–81.
  12. Template:Cite journal
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 Template:Cite journal
  14. Template:Cite journal
  15. Template:Cite episode
  16. Template:Cite journal
  17. Template:Cite journal
  18. Template:Cite web
  19. Darwin, C. R. 1875. Insectivorous Plants.
  21. Gagliardo, R. (June 1996). A new cultivar of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 25(2): 50.
  22. Bily, G. (December 2010). Dionaea muscipula ‘Alien’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(4): 117–120.
  23. 23.00 23.01 23.02 23.03 23.04 23.05 23.06 23.07 23.08 23.09 23.10 23.11 23.12 Registered Cultivar Names: Dionaea. International Carnivorous Plant Society.
  24. Bily, G. (September 2012). Dionaea muscipula ‘Blanche Hermine’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 41(3): 116–120.
  25. Srba, M. (September 2007). Dionaea muscipula ‘Bohemian Garnet’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 36(3): 68–70.
  26. Clayton, C. (March 2004). Dionaea ‘Clayton’s Red Sunset’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 33(1): 19–22.
  27. Bily, G. (December 2010). Dionaea muscipula ‘Coquillage’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(4): 117–120.
  28. Stewart, S. (September 2004). Dionaea muscipula ‘Cupped Trap’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 33(3): 83–89.
  29. Meyers-Rice, B. (March 2000). Dionaea 'Dentate Traps'. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 29(1): 14–21.
  30. Bily, G. (September 2011). Dionaea muscipula ‘Fondue’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 40(3): 95–98.
  31. Carow, T. (December 2004). Dionaea 'Fused Tooth'. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 33(4): 100–101.
  32. Domínguez, J.A.G. (December 2011). Dionaea ‘JA1’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 40(4): 136–140.
  33. Song, L. (December 2001). Dionaea ‘Jaws’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 30(4): 111–116.
  34. Gi-Won, J. & W.H. Yoon (June 2010). Dionaea ‘Korean Melody Shark’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(2): 36–45.
  35. Bily, G. (June 2010). Dionaea ‘Korrigans’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(2): 36–45.
  36. Anfraix, R. (December 2004). Dionaea 'Louchapates' (Dionaea 'Noodle Ladle'). In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 33(4): 100–101.
  37. Quenon, G. (March 2008). Dionaea muscipula 'Microdents'. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 37(1): 22–26.
  38. [Anonymous] (June 2008). Erratum: Dionaea ‘Microdent’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 37(2): 44–46.
  39. Blancquaert, D. (September 2010). Dionaea ‘Mirror’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(3): 78–81.
  40. Ziemer, R. (June 2007). Dionaea muscipula ‘Petite Dragon’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 36(2): 53–56.
  41. Read, E. (September 1999). New Cultivar Dionaea 'Red Piranha'. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 28(3): 99.
  42. Meyers-Rice, B. (March 2000). Dionaea 'Sawtooth'. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 29(1): 14–21.
  43. Blacher, L. (March 2012). Dionaea ‘Scarlatine’ (English: D. ‘Scarlet Fever’). In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 41(1): 27–30.
  44. Real Keehn Concepts (June 2010). Dionaea ‘Scarlet Bristle’. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39(2): 36–45.
  45. Meyers-Rice, B. (March 2000). Dionaea 'Sawtooth'. In: New Cultivars. Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 29(1): 14–21.
  46. 46.0 46.1 How to generate funds to conserve wild populations

External linksRectify

Template:Wikispecies Template:Commons

Template:CarnivorousPlants Template:Use dmy datesTemplate:Link GA Template:Link FA

ar:خناق الذباب az:Milçəkqapan bn:ভেনাস ফ্লাইট্র্যাপ (উদ্ভিদ) zh-min-nan:Lia̍h-sîn-chháu bg:Венерина мухоловка ca:Dionea cs:Mucholapka podivná da:Fluefanger de:Venusfliegenfalle et:Kärbsepüünis el:Διωναία es:Dionaea eo:Muŝkaptulo eu:Venus eulijale fa:ونوس مگس‌خوارko:파리지옥 hsb:Muchowy rybork hr:Venerina muholovka is:Venusargildra it:Dionaea muscipula he:דיונאה ka:ვენერას ბუზიჭერია la:Dionaea muscipula lt:Jautrusis musėkautas hu:Vénusz légycsapója ml:ഡയോണിയ mr:व्हीनस फ्लायट्रॅप nl:Venusvliegenvanger ja:ハエトリグサ no:Venusfluefangerpt:Dioneia ro:Dionaea muscipulasimple:Venus Flytrap sk:Mucholapka (rod) sl:Muholovka fi:Kärpäsloukku sv:Venus flugfälla ta:வில் பொறி te:డయోనియా th:กาบหอยแครง tr:Sinekkapan bitkisi uk:Венерина мухоловка zh:捕蠅草

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.